Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Signal/gdb oddity in 2.5.61 | Date | Sun, 16 Feb 2003 21:34:23 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> |
| |
roland@redhat.com said: > Anyone who wants to use an old gdb with a new kernel can use "handle > SIGSTOP nopass". Is that a real imposition? Anyway, aside from the > test suite, it only affects gdb users in a way that may confuse them > for a few seconds but doesn't prevent them from debugging normally.
It may also affect UML, since it has come to know exactly what to expect from a ptraced process. So, when you have the semantics nailed down and implemented, can you see if UML still runs?
Not that it's a showstopper if it doesn't, but I'd like to know so I can fiddle UML so that it continues to run.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |