[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fw: 2.5.61 oops running SDET

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Do you want to replace tasklist_lock with task_lock in exit_sighand()
> and during exec, or do you want to add task_lock to tasklist_lock?

I'd rather replace it, but your point about irq-safeness is a good one.
Clearly signal sending cannot take the task lock if we want to keep it

So the signal stuff probably does need to be protected by _both_ the
tasklist lock and the provate task lock.

> Someone removed the read_lock(tasklist_lock) around
> send_specific_sig_info() - which lock synchronizes exec and signal delivery?

Looks like none. And I think it was Ingo who removed it. Ingo?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:2.099 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site