Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Feb 2003 21:18:08 -0300 | From | Werner Almesberger <> | Subject | Re: Synchronous signal delivery.. |
| |
Davide Libenzi wrote: > You could do that, even if when you start having many timers things might > get messy.
Manage a list of pending timers, schedule a signal for the next one (or, if you wish, launch a thread), etc. All that is pretty standard stuff that can be hidden in some library function, and you can even steal a lot of the code from the kernel :-)
It would be useful, though, to have something like the "overwrite" function I described later in this thread, in case there is a single fd that can accumulate more timer expirations between reads, than fit into the pipe/queue. (Admittedly a bit of a fringe scenario.)
- Werner
-- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |