Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 15 Feb 2003 09:33:15 +0100 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2 |
| |
On Fri, Feb 14 2003, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > The version posted the other day did fair queueing of requests between > > processes, but it did not help to provide fair request allocation. This > > version does that too, results are rather remarkable. In addition, the > > following changes were made: > > The numbers from the second message are nice - especially considering this > is only the second iteration... > > A question about io priorities. I wonder if they could not be implemented > via a per pid cfq_quantum? If I am not missunderstanding things, a bigger > value here for a given process should mean that it gets a larger share of > the io bandwidth...
That's exactly right, and yes that would be one way of doing it.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |