[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2
On Fri, Feb 14 2003, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > The version posted the other day did fair queueing of requests between
> > processes, but it did not help to provide fair request allocation. This
> > version does that too, results are rather remarkable. In addition, the
> > following changes were made:
> The numbers from the second message are nice - especially considering this
> is only the second iteration...
> A question about io priorities. I wonder if they could not be implemented
> via a per pid cfq_quantum? If I am not missunderstanding things, a bigger
> value here for a given process should mean that it gets a larger share of
> the io bandwidth...

That's exactly right, and yes that would be one way of doing it.

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.072 / U:4.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site