[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: openbkweb-0.0
    On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:

    > On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:56:02PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
    > > Larry, I already said this and maybe you missed it ( or maybe not ).
    > > What about having a GPLed ( or whatever other license ), read-only BK
    > > available for the ones that simply need to fetch stuff from BK
    > > repositories ? You don't have to maintain another repository for
    > > compatibility, and also you enforce BK usage.
    > We're not going to expose the network protocol. For two reasons:
    > - it works really well (we're proud of this)
    > - it is really ugly (we're not proud of this :)
    > A read only client isn't read only, it has to be read/write to update the
    > out of date copy.

    I was meaning read-only for the repository point of view. Ok, you don't
    need to give away the protocol. You don't even have to give away source
    code. Why don't you choose a binary license that removes things that ppl
    are against of here ?

    - Davide

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.021 / U:41.956 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site