Messages in this thread | | | From | Ed Tomlinson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2 | Date | Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:38:44 -0500 |
| |
Jens Axboe wrote:
> The version posted the other day did fair queueing of requests between > processes, but it did not help to provide fair request allocation. This > version does that too, results are rather remarkable. In addition, the > following changes were made:
The numbers from the second message are nice - especially considering this is only the second iteration...
A question about io priorities. I wonder if they could not be implemented via a per pid cfq_quantum? If I am not missunderstanding things, a bigger value here for a given process should mean that it gets a larger share of the io bandwidth...
Comments? Ed Tomlinson
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |