lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2
    Date
    Jens Axboe wrote:

    > The version posted the other day did fair queueing of requests between
    > processes, but it did not help to provide fair request allocation. This
    > version does that too, results are rather remarkable. In addition, the
    > following changes were made:

    The numbers from the second message are nice - especially considering this
    is only the second iteration...

    A question about io priorities. I wonder if they could not be implemented
    via a per pid cfq_quantum? If I am not missunderstanding things, a bigger
    value here for a given process should mean that it gets a larger share of
    the io bandwidth...

    Comments?
    Ed Tomlinson




    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.021 / U:58.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site