[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface

On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Rusty Russell wrote:

> > It's not the same, please see:
> >
> > I explained why the current module locking is more complex and why it's
> > actually a three stage delete.
> No, here is where you show *your* ignorance of kernel locking idioms,
> and that your axiom is that "the new system is more complex".

Another point you probably misunderstood: I said that the complexity of
the new and the old system is exactly the same, please read more carefully
before flaming, it might backfire.

> > Rusty, above are real problems, the module locking fixes these problems
> > during module_init/module_exit, but how can these problems fixed in the
> > other cases and how does the module locking help?
> This isn't even a sensible question: "This is not a module problem.
> How does module locking help?"

I hate to drag people into a discussion, but maybe you're more inclined
to believe Al:

Please read this very careful and think about it.

bye, Roman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.162 / U:1.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site