[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.5.60 cheerleading...
    On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 04:03:00PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
    > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:29:12AM -0600, Paul Larson wrote:
    > > It would be nice if that were true, but back here in reality things are
    > > rarely if ever even stable enough for testing if they merely build and
    > > boot.
    > >
    > > If Linus really is building and booting every kernel prior to release,
    > > it would be quick and simple to add a fast subset of LTP to the mix and
    > > do a quick regression run. It's convenient, fast and could save a lot
    > > of headaches for a lot of people later on.
    > Nothing stops people from LTPtesting the -bk nightlies.
    > Sure, they won't catch the last-minute-torvalds-breaks-the-compile
    > type bugs, but for the most part it should be useful enough info.

    Agreed... at least the past few releases, the just-after-the-release BK
    snapshot often compiles and boots more reliably than the release <g>

    Current 2.5.60-BK is looking _really_ nice, LTP-wise.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.031 / U:1.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site