lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest]
Date
axboe@suse.de said:
>> By all means, do the same thing with disk i/o. It's been a smashing
>> success with packet queueing.
>
> Well, that's the point.

Yes, what you've done with cbq is great. What I was referring to,
though, is the user configurability of network frame queueing. It's
possible to do really complex things for very specialized needs, yet
also easy to put in a simple tweak if there's just one type of traffic
you need to prioritize. It'd be nice to have that kind of
configurability for unusual i/o loads, and the arbitrary queue stacking
is a whole different beast than having a couple of tunables to tweak.

Jason

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:33    [W:0.119 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site