Messages in this thread | | | From | Jason Lunz <> | Subject | Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest] | Date | Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) |
| |
axboe@suse.de said: >> By all means, do the same thing with disk i/o. It's been a smashing >> success with packet queueing. > > Well, that's the point.
Yes, what you've done with cbq is great. What I was referring to, though, is the user configurability of network frame queueing. It's possible to do really complex things for very specialized needs, yet also easy to put in a simple tweak if there's just one type of traffic you need to prioritize. It'd be nice to have that kind of configurability for unusual i/o loads, and the arbitrary queue stacking is a whole different beast than having a couple of tunables to tweak.
Jason
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |