lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: const versus __attribute__((const))
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Agreed. It's just a bit ugly that the "m" in "rm" has a different
> meaning than just "m".

Oh? What does the "m" in "m,m" mean then?

(I don't have GCC 3.3 to try it here).

Sometimes that's useful, when used with differing multi-alternative
constraints on the other arguments, and 99% of the time you _do_ want
the "m,m" constraint to use the actual lvalue's address just like "m".

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.131 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site