Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:15:30 +0000 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: const versus __attribute__((const)) |
| |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Agreed. It's just a bit ugly that the "m" in "rm" has a different > meaning than just "m".
Oh? What does the "m" in "m,m" mean then?
(I don't have GCC 3.3 to try it here).
Sometimes that's useful, when used with differing multi-alternative constraints on the other arguments, and 99% of the time you _do_ want the "m,m" constraint to use the actual lvalue's address just like "m".
-- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |