Messages in this thread | | | From | Matthias Urlichs <> | Subject | Re: question about preempt_disable() | Date | Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:31:27 +0100 |
| |
Hi,
Rob Love wrote: > Further, on uniprocessor systems, we don't have deadlocks so it is the > preempt_disable() that actually ensures concurrency is prevented in the > critical region. > We don't have _spin_locks.
-- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@debian.org Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.debian.net - - I don't care how poor and inefficient a country is; they like to run their own business. I know men that would make my wife a better husband than I am; but, darn it, I'm not going to give her to 'em. -- Will Rogers
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |