lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: aio on ramfs
From
Date
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> writes:

> William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> writes:
> >> +static int ramfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> >> +{
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
>
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:40:03AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > Doesn't this break the magic of shrink_list()? I think it need the
> > "return WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE;" at least.
>
> In truth these things shouldn't be on the LRU at all, though they're
> probably blindly plopped down there. My handwavy argument was that it
> makes no sense to do anything with it on the LRU and that I'd nopped
> out ->set_page_dirty() anyhow (i.e. PG_dirty should never get set). Does
> that hold enough water or should I still hand back WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE?

I see. Sorry for noise.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.052 / U:0.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site