lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
Helge Hafting wrote:

> Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote:
>
>> GPL is about distribution.
>>
>> e.g. NVidia can distribute .o file (with whatever license they have
>> to) and nvidia.{c,h} files (even under GPL license).
>> Then install.sh may do on behalf of user "gcc nvidia.c blob.o -o
>> nvidia.ko". Resulting module are not going to be distributed - it is
>> already at hand of end-user. So no violation of GPL whatsoever.
>
>
> Open source still win if they do this. Anybody interested
> may then read the restricted source and find out how
> the chip works. They may then write an open driver
> from scratch, using the knowledge.

What I think he means is that nvidia.c only contains glue code and
blob.o contains the secret parts just like the current driver from
nvidia.

// Stefan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:1.074 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site