[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
    On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 15:23:10 +1100, Peter Chubb said:

    > As far as I know, interfacing to a published API doesn't infringe
    > copyright.

    Well, if the only thing in the .h files was #defines and structure definitions,
    it would probably be a slam dunk to decide that, yes.

    Here's the part where people's eyes glaze over:

    % cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.0-test10-mm1
    % find include -name '*.h' | xargs egrep 'static.*inline' | wc -l

    That's 6,288 chances for you to #include GPL code and end up
    with executable derived from it in *your* .o file, not the kernel's.

    More to the point, look at include/linux/rwsem.h, and ask yourself
    how to call down_read(), down_write(), up_read(), and up_write()
    without getting little snippets of GPL all over your .o.

    And even if your module doesn't get screwed by that, there's a
    few other equally dangerous inlines waiting to bite you on the posterior.

    I seem to recall one of the little buggers was particularly nasty, because it
    simply Would Not Work if not inlined, so compiling with -fno-inline wasn't an
    option. Unfortunately, I can't remember which it was - it was mentioned on
    here a while ago when somebody's kernel failed to boot because a gcc 3.mumble
    had broken inlining.....

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:4.441 / U:3.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site