lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray)
Date
>De: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
[...]
>Jerome - can you test Nathan's patch together with my "avoid the
>complicated slab logic"? The slab avoidance thing got ext3 stable for you,
>now with Nathan's patch hopefully XFS will be stable too.
[...]

OK, I will do intensive tests this week-end, I have time. I just want to have some confirmations:

1. Is it still usefull to get all the backtraces of the last xfs oops ?
2. I will test patch-slab and patch-xfs on test11, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC (only). Test on XFS root and ext3 with "small" and "big" kernels.
3. What about patch-bio of Manfred ? I didn't have much time to try it yet but seems to stabilize too. Should I use it alone or with the others patchs ?

Thanks all for your help

Jerome Pinot

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.029 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site