Messages in this thread | | | From | pinotj@club-int ... | Subject | Re: Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray) | Date | Fri, 5 Dec 2003 23:57:26 CET |
| |
>De: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> [...] >Jerome - can you test Nathan's patch together with my "avoid the >complicated slab logic"? The slab avoidance thing got ext3 stable for you, >now with Nathan's patch hopefully XFS will be stable too. [...]
OK, I will do intensive tests this week-end, I have time. I just want to have some confirmations:
1. Is it still usefull to get all the backtraces of the last xfs oops ? 2. I will test patch-slab and patch-xfs on test11, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC (only). Test on XFS root and ext3 with "small" and "big" kernels. 3. What about patch-bio of Manfred ? I didn't have much time to try it yet but seems to stabilize too. Should I use it alone or with the others patchs ?
Thanks all for your help
Jerome Pinot
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |