Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 31 Dec 2003 18:30:04 -0800 | From | Javier Fernandez-Ivern <> | Subject | Re: File change notification |
| |
Michael Clark wrote:
> Yes I see what you mean after having a look. Would make sense to convert > this over to use only LSM hooks (which it appears to use already) if that > was possible - or maybe could be done using a VFS proxy filesystem that > monitors/relays calls to an underlying fs.
I don't think using LSM hooks for this is a good idea. While it makes the changes less invasive, it forces you to enable LSM just to get file change modifications.
-- Javier Fernandez-Ivern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |