Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:06:01 -0200 (BRST) | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | Subject | Re: XFS for 2.4 |
| |
On 3 Dec 2003, bill davidsen wrote:
> is code which has has been stable for years. There just aren't any > other candidates, all the other FS stuff went in with less testing and > have fewer users now (JFS as example). This is also not code offered > "right before a freeze" this code has been offered version by version > for two bleepin' years, has it not? There's no slippery slope, there > are no other major features which have proven long-term stability. Fell > free to name them if I'm wrong... > > Marcelo admits he doesn't like the coding style, he has the right to > keep out anything he doesn't like, but let's not invent other reasons. > It's his call and he made it. It's a pity he didn't make the call > earlier and save people the effort, though.
Actually my personal opinion should not matter that much in this case.
But anyway, Christoph Hellwig is reviewing the XFS patches for inclusion.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |