lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: XFS for 2.4
Date
In article <1070410409.3fcd2aa9c0d42@horde.sandall.us>,
Eric Sandall <eric@sandall.us> wrote:
| Quoting Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>:
| > On Dec-02 2003, Tue, 16:01 -0200
| > Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> wrote:
| >
| >
| > > Its too late for it to be included in 2.4. Use 2.6 or a modified 2.4 tree.
| >
| >
| > A: Looking good, come back later, though.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Come back later.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Come back later.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Come back later.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Sorry, you're too late.
| > B: W--What?
| > A: You heard me. (Also I don't like your shoes.)
| >
| >
| > (Sounds a bit like Monty Python to me, can't help it.)
|
| You know, that's what I've been thinking this whole time. Almost sounds like
| someone has a grudge against XFS (or something/someone related to XFS).
|
| Just my non-technical opinion.

You mean like someone just doesn't like the style of the code?
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.067 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site