[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.0-mjb1
    >> I'd be very interested in feedback from anyone willing to test on any
    >> platform, however large or small.
    > It's working perfectly for me: in fact it's what I'm running right now.
    > I'm running it on an Asus M3700N laptop...
    > Any tests you want me to do, just e-mail asking them.

    Cool - thanks. It probably doesn't get as much testing under memory
    pressure as it should on laptop-sized systems (though I do my best on
    my own boxes). I'd be interested to see how it performs for people on
    desktop/laptops compared to virgin 2.6.0 - objrmap pays a little during
    pageout for what it gains during regular usage. Just regular desktop
    workload stuff, but measuring performance can be somewhat subjective
    unless you have a more formal (and artificial) test. As long as it's
    tangibly worse, that's fine.

    Or if people are bored, and want something functional to test ... ;-)
    Fiddle with some of the new config options, eg turn on 4/4 split or
    2/2 split, or HZ=100, kgdb, kcg, schedstat, etc. Early printk is
    interesting too, but harder to test - you really need to make it
    lock up before console_init somehow (adding a BUG() or something).



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.032 / U:14.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site