Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Dec 2003 08:45:15 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sysfs class patches - take 2 [0/5] |
| |
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 03:27:17PM +0100, Kronos wrote: > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 04:57:56PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Interesting... I bet that will be useful to the iPAQ folks (I've been > > > wading through their patches lately), as they have created a couple > > > ultra-simple classes for SoC devices and such. > > > > I bet it will. I've ported my old frame buffer patch to use it, and > > it saved a lot of code. > > > > Hm, I wonder if the frame buffer people ever intregrated that patch... > > I had a patch that add class_device to struct fb_info. This was 3-4 > months ago.
So all of the frame buffer drivers have to be changed to dynamically allocate the fb_info structure? That's the "proper" way to do this, but I felt it was a bit too late in the 2.6 development cycle to try to intregrate such a large change in...
Oh well,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |