lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: XFS for 2.4
I think the dislike is justified.  XFS is kind of like an alien parasite 
attached to Linux. IRIX's IO system is different, it's taken a lot of
changes. I still think it is the best filesystem with a lot of unused
potential though. I hope it will eventually be well integrated -
2.6/2.8. It's only the generic code changes we need to worry about
though, right?

Regards,

Jeremy Jackson

Russell Cattelan wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 05:18, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>Also I'm not completly sure if the generic changes are fine and I dont
>>like the XFS code in general.
>
> Ahh so the real truth comes out.
>
>
> Is there a reason for your sudden dislike of the XFS code?
> or is this just an arbitrary general dislike for unknown or
> unstated reasons?
>
>



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.053 / U:6.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site