[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: libata in 2.4.24?
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:53:36PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:36:19AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> >
> > Erik Steffl <> writes:
> >
> > > not for drives >133GB (I have intel D865PERL mb and 250GB matrox, it doesn't
> > > work without SCSI_ATA (at all), it cannot read/write above 133GB without libata
> > > patches)
> >
> > My ICH5 was happily using my brand new 200GB SATA maxtor drive, at least up
> > until last Friday when it crashed. Grumble, a brand new drive.
> >
> > I guess what I'm looking for is the "FAQ" or "README" file that most projects
> > have. What are the advantages of using the libata patch vs the stock drivers
> > and vice versa? What are the differences between the two?
> Libata, uses the scsi system instead of the existing ide layer because many
> new sata controllers are using an interface that is very similair to scsi
> (much like atapi).
> The existing ide layer is geared tward pata (old style with 40 or 80 pins),
> and any sata controller that behaves like a pata coltroller. That's why
> ICH5 and VIA's controllers are supported first (and not with all of their
> features like hotplug and some others).
> I'd say use the stock ide driver unless libata gives you features you need,
> or a >30% speed boost.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.055 / U:10.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site