lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: System clock and speedstepping
Date
On Monday 01 December 2003 23:40, john stultz wrote:
>
> The "sane timesource" is the PIT (programmable interval timer). The TSC
> is the Time-Stamp-Counter which is basically a cycle counter on the cpu.
> If you want to boot using the PIT instead of the TSC, you can override
> the default time source by using "clock=pit" as a boot option. However
> hopefully the problem can be fixed by adjusting the cpufreq code. As I
> don't have any such hardware, would you be interested in testing
> possible patches?
>
> thanks
> -john
>

Im willing to solve it another way: There is a patch around (included in the
mm paches) for the kernel wich introduces a ACPI timer (timesource). As im
successfully using ACPI here ill switch over to it. A collegue of mine (who
had equal problems) reportet that this driver solves the problem completly.

About your patches: I would surely test your patches... i think its necessray
to have a good bug less standard implementation of the timesource.

BTW: The time screw was huge. Especially if i ran programms wich needed all
the recources avalible (while(1){}).

cheers,
Raffaele
--
Raffaele Sandrini <rasa@gmx.ch>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.058 / U:3.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site