lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4 future
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:09:04PM +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski escreveu:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:03:15 -0200
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
>
> > Em Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu escreveu:
> > > I can only second that. We've been using XFS here since the days of
> > > 2.4.0-testxx and the only problems we've had were sitting between the
> > > chair and the keyboard.
> >
> > So if there is no problems at all using it as a patch why add this to a
> > kernel that is phasing out?
>
> Because it is _not_.

So what? You disagree, what is the problem of keeping a patch out of the tree
if the tree is getting in deep freeze?

> I really wonder how many of you have read this list up to 2.4.11 release ...
>
> Is there some human-memory-loss-virus flooding the area ?
>
> Please stay serious.

I'm staying, please stay too.

And I was on this list _way_ before 2.4.11, 2.6 has, IMHO, a different story.

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.073 / U:18.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site