Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: gcc-3.3.2 vs 2.6.0-test11 | From | Martin Schlemmer <> | Date | Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:16:32 +0200 |
| |
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 02:04, J.A. Magallon wrote: > On 12.17, J.A. Magallon wrote: > > hi all.. > > > > Are there any known issues wrt gcc-3.3.2 ? > > I built test11 with gcc-3.3.1 and worked fine, the same config built with > > 3.3.2 does not pass init launch: > > > > INIT version 2.85 booting > > > > and nothing more.... > > > > I have to check, but I think it also miscompiles 2.4. I rebuilt a kernel on a > > remote box (2.4.23 + assorted patches), that worked fine under 3.3.1, and > > after reboot the box didn't came to life, no ping. > > > > Well, it fails to compile also 2.4. A 2.4 kernel that worked fine hangs when > launching init if built with this gcc. It boots again if is built at -O instead > of -O2. > > I think it is a Mandrake specific problem, as changelog reads: > > * Tue Dec 16 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com> 3.3.2-2mdk > > - Add gcj(1), aka make gc happy > - Add [ep]mmintrin.h for even for SSE/PNI intrinsics > - Move cc1 to gcc-cpp, thusly nuking gcc dep for XFree86 > - Remove -funit-at-a-time from -O2 since it is memory hungry > > * Mon Dec 15 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com> 3.3.2-1mdk > > - 3.3.2 + 3.3-hammer branch (2003/12/08) > > I think I don't like that hammer branch...
I wont add my opinion here about the hammer branch, but try the gcc-3_3-rhl-branch which is gcc-3.3.relative_current maintained by Jakub, and used by us with a patch or two added.
Regards,
--
Martin Schlemmer
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |