lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: gcc-3.3.2 vs 2.6.0-test11
From
Date
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 02:04, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> On 12.17, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > hi all..
> >
> > Are there any known issues wrt gcc-3.3.2 ?
> > I built test11 with gcc-3.3.1 and worked fine, the same config built with
> > 3.3.2 does not pass init launch:
> >
> > INIT version 2.85 booting
> >
> > and nothing more....
> >
> > I have to check, but I think it also miscompiles 2.4. I rebuilt a kernel on a
> > remote box (2.4.23 + assorted patches), that worked fine under 3.3.1, and
> > after reboot the box didn't came to life, no ping.
> >
>
> Well, it fails to compile also 2.4. A 2.4 kernel that worked fine hangs when
> launching init if built with this gcc. It boots again if is built at -O instead
> of -O2.
>
> I think it is a Mandrake specific problem, as changelog reads:
>
> * Tue Dec 16 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com> 3.3.2-2mdk
>
> - Add gcj(1), aka make gc happy
> - Add [ep]mmintrin.h for even for SSE/PNI intrinsics
> - Move cc1 to gcc-cpp, thusly nuking gcc dep for XFree86
> - Remove -funit-at-a-time from -O2 since it is memory hungry
>
> * Mon Dec 15 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com> 3.3.2-1mdk
>
> - 3.3.2 + 3.3-hammer branch (2003/12/08)
>
> I think I don't like that hammer branch...

I wont add my opinion here about the hammer branch, but try
the gcc-3_3-rhl-branch which is gcc-3.3.relative_current maintained
by Jakub, and used by us with a patch or two added.


Regards,

--

Martin Schlemmer



[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.051 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site