[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.0-test11-mm1
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Christian Axelsson <> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Walrond wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 17 Dec 2003 9:43 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > What are your intentions with -mm when you take over 2.6? Is any of -mm
> > > getting into 2.6 before 2.6.0 release? Is it mainly queued for 2.6.1?
> We'll start merging it up after 2.6.0. It'll be quite a lot of work,
> actually - a lot of things have been parked in -mm for some time and may
> not have had sufficiently wide testing, especially on non-i386. I need to
> ask the originators and others to re-review and retest some things.
> > I would like to know aswell :)
> > Will you be "bleeding edge" maintainer aswell or will that be handed
> > over to someone else?
> I guess I'll keep -mm going until there's a reason not to.

Quite frankly I am becoming concerned about the number of patches that are
queued for post 2.6.0. It is beginning to look like 2.6.0 might be nice
and quiet while 2.6.1+ are going to be quite messy as all the things "on
hold" get put in.

I'm going to do my part by pounding heavily on -mm kernels since that
appears where all this is ending up.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.072 / U:4.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site