Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Matthew D. Pitts" <> | Subject | Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper | Date | Tue, 16 Dec 2003 23:47:33 -0500 |
| |
> The implication you made was that certain other people > are violating > your license by exporting changesets publicly. If that is true, then > that is highly relevant to this list. kernel.org, for example would > have to remove changeset information such as > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/cset/
In my opinion, what is here is nothing more than information that most likely does not contain anything that would violate the BK license. The check-in comments could easily have been take from the bkbits site and put into HTML code, and there is a gzipped patch that could simply be gotten through use of BK. Larry, if I'm wrong about any of this, please feel free to tell me. > -Tupshin Matthew D. Pitts
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |