Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:42:26 -0800 | From | Larry McVoy <> | Subject | Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper |
| |
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:31:04PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > One thing that I've wished for in the past which looks like it *might* > be trivial to do is to grab a raw version of the patch you already > put out in HTML format, eg if I surf down changesets and get to a page > like this: > > http://linus.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/patch@1.1522?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-2w|cset@1.1522
We can do that and we will, it's just not hit the top of the priority list. Given past discussions on this list I had thought there was a strong need for a way to trivially track any BK tree without BK, maybe I misunderstood what was being asked.
There isn't any reason we can't do both. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |