Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:44:23 -0800 | From | Larry McVoy <> | Subject | Re: RFC - tarball/patch server in BitKeeper |
| |
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:05:03AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 09:21:56 -0800, > Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote: > >I've prototyped an extension to BitKeeper that provides tarballs > >and patches. ... > >... You need to understand that this is all you get, > >we're not going to extend this so you can do anything but track the most > >recent sources accurately. No diffs. No getting anything but the most > >recent version. No revision history. > > Do we get the changelogs from each BK check in? Without the > changelogs, patches are going to be much less useful.
You already get those, use BK/Web. It's all there and always has been. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |