Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:02:54 -0500 | From | Bob <> | Subject | Re: [2.4] Nforce2 oops and occasional hang (tried the lockups patch, no difference) |
| |
Ross Dickson wrote:
>Oh, and the modules list: > Module Size Used by Tainted: P > i2c-dev 4548 0 (unused) > i2c-core 13604 0 [i2c-dev] ><snip> > > >I am not certain your problems are nforce2 type specific. >Standard response: I don't suppose you can try a different stick of ram? > > Yes, and stock settings with tested ram may be necessary with nforce2, possibly related to our timing-related voodoo culture(might overclock later on in life as timing-related patches evolve).
I have a via board that only recognizes two of four generic ram sticks, but second stick will cause an oops soon after. Another via setup will oops if any fast ram settings(4-way,csl2 etc) is attempted, though only using tested cas2 ram. "Try a different stick of ram".
On nforce2 I'm able to use bios "performance" ram timing but if I manually tweak all the ram settings up like I can do on other systems, I get mem-related OOPS with nforce2.
acpi apic lapic amd pre-empt nforce2ide (once you start you have to go all the way)
>The reason I say that is that oops were very uncommon on either the >epox 8rga+ or albatron km18G-pro MOBOS upon which I developed my >patches. Hard lockups were pretty much all I experienced prior to the >patches except for an occasional X fail. Base OS flavour I >use is Suse 8.2 including gcc version (web updates utilised) > >The udma patches are really just a cleanup on the address setup timing so >I do not think that they are a factor. > >The local apic ack delay timing patch needs athlon cpu and amd/nvidia ide on in >kern config to kick in. If you are using it then I highly recommend uniprocessor >ioapic config as well to go with it to route the 8254 timer irq0 through pin 0 of >ioapic as using the apic config alone leaves a lot of ints generated on irq7 >which can cause problems. (Reason for 8259 making them spurious on irq7 >is explained in 8259A data sheet) > >Also I now use a small patch to fixup proc info - only if you are using >the 64 bit jiffies var hz patch, avail here: > >http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2003-12/0838.html > >If you try acpi=off on boot and it is then not very stable then I think it has >little to do with lockups patch as that is my fallback mode when I am >playing with apic ioapic code. > >Another fallback I use at times is > >hdparm -Xudma3 /dev/hda > >Hope this helps the confusion > >Regards >Ross > > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |