[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Handle R_ALPHA_REFLONG relocation on Alpha (2.6.0-test11)
Thus spake M?ns Rullg?rd:
> Which gcc and binutils versions do you use? I've seen some variation
> in which relocations they produce.

I'm using gcc 3.3.2 and binutils The patch shouldn't hurt
when using versions which may produce other relocations, correct? If
R_ALPHA_REFLONG isn't generated, then that bit of the switch statement
just wouldn't be hit.

Nathan Poznick <>

If you write something wrong enough, I'll be glad to make up a new
witticism just for you. -- Larry Wall

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.097 / U:8.516 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site