[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Is there a "make hole" (truncate in middle) syscall?
    On Friday 12 December 2003 08:24, Jörn Engel wrote:

    > > ...and it sucks. Same problem as with updatedb - 99% of all work is
    > > bogus, but you don't know which 99%, because the one knowing about it,
    > > the kernel, doesn't tell you a thing.
    > Actually, updatedb sucks even worse. The database is notoriously
    > outdated and each run of updatedb has the effect of flushing the
    > cache. Because of the cache-flushing effect, you cannot even run it
    > with maximum niceness. Running it still hurts you *afterwards*.
    > Same goes for you userland daemon without kernel support.
    > Jörn

    1) The date optimization, only looking at files newer than the last run, means
    you can avoid looking at 90% of the filesystem.

    2) If drop-behind ever gets working, life is good for this sort of thing. If
    not, there's always O_DIRECT or its replacement (whatever Linus and the
    oracle guy were arguing about last month)...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.024 / U:0.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site