lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
From
Date
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 07:58, David Woodhouse wrote:

> My point, however, was that a copyright licence _can_ make such
> requirements. It _can_ require you to bathe daily in creosote too, and
> if you don't like that you have the option of not using the software
> which is licensed that way.

I'd be willing to bet, that since bathing in creosote is extremely
unhealthy, the courts might well find that that restriction was
nonsense. This being the case they might decide that taken as a whole
the license was a fraud and grant the public the right to unrestricted
use of the product in question. Especially if the defendants lawyer was
particularly good.
--
Brian Beattie | Experienced kernel hacker/embedded systems
beattie@beattie-home.net | programmer, direct or contract, short or
www.beattie-home.net | long term, available immediately.

"Honor isn't about making the right choices.
It's about dealing with the consequences." -- Midori Koto


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.362 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site