[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 20:43, David Brownell wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 December 2003 18:34, David Brownell wrote:
> >>>Unfortunately, usb_physical_reset_device calls usb_set_configuration
> >>>which takes dev->serialize.
> >>
> >>Not since late August it doesn't ...
> >
> > In current 2.5 bitkeeper it does.
> usb_physical_reset_device() does not call usb_set_configuration()
> except in the known-broken (for other reasons too!) "firmware changed"
> path. Known-broken, but not yet removed since nobody has reported
> running into that or the other deadlock; the real fix is force
> re-enumeration of the device.

Still, it could be changed into a call to usb_physical_set_configuration
while we're waiting for a real fix, right?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.071 / U:7.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site