[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [OOPS, usbcore, releaseintf] 2.6.0-test10-mm1
> > I don't know if you've been following this thread or not, but the oops
> > occurred when I modified usbfs to hold a reference to the usb_device
> > until no-one was using a given usbfs file.
> That's a good thing to do. It should work.
> > I guess this means that I should change my patch so that the reference
> > to the usb_device is dropped as soon as possible, right?
> No, the bug should be fixed. I've seen this bug happen if someone has a
> usb-serial device open and then unload the host controller driver. In
> fact, I think there's a bugzilla entry just for that...

Hi Greg, what I meant was: should I make my patch friendlier to rmmod by
trying hard to drop the reference as soon as possible, though some code paths
may have to hold on to it for a long time (cost: code complication), or is it OK
to always hang onto the usb_device as long as one of the usbfs files is open
(cost: rmmod may take a long or infinite time; advantages: simple, robust)?
This lowly one humbly awaits enlightenment... :)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.109 / U:2.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site