[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: mlock() "bogus check" (locked > num_physpages/2) _does_ hurt!
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 13:59, Lutz Vieweg wrote:

> Is there any good reason to keep this check in the 2.4 kernel sources?

Not really.

> It's good to know the check is not present in the 2.6 sources, but I would
> like to get rid of it in 2.4, too...

It was removed from 2.6 for the reasons you cite. 2.4 could follow

It does lead to problems, though, where you can memlock too much memory
and lock the machine up. But we could file that under "don't do that".

Rob Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.023 / U:5.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site