lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [CFT][RFC] HT scheduler


Rhino wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:14:45 +1100
>Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>You won't be able to merge mine with Ingo's. Which one put the box on
>>steroids? :)
>>
>
>sorry if i wasn't clearly enough, but i merged each one of them separately on top of a wli-2.
>that comment was for the wli changes. :)
>
>
>>Wonder whats going on here? Is this my patch vs Ingo's with nothing else
>>applied?
>>How does plain 2.6.0-test11 go?
>>
>>Thanks for testing.
>>
>
>
>ok, this time on a plain test11.
>

I mean, what results does test11 get when running the benchmarks.

>
>hackbench:
>
> w26 sched-SMT-C1
>
> 50 5.026 50 5.182
> 100 10.062 100 10.602
> 150 15.906 150 16.214
>
>
>time tar -xvjpf linux-2.6.0-test11.tar.bz2:
>
> w26 sched-SMT-C1
>
> real 0m21.835s real 0m21.827s
> user 0m20.274s user 0m20.412s
> sys 0m4.178s sys 0m4.260s
>
^^^^^^^^
OK I guess the real 43s in your last set of results was a typo.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.058 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site