[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
    On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:37:58PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
    > Your conditions for granting that permission do _not_ have to be
    > restricted to licensing of derived works. You can even ask for _money_
    > in return, if you like. Or you could require that the lucky recipient
    > bathe in creosote daily, in order to receive your licence.

    NAL, but look up "misuse of copyright". You can't just require
    whatever pleases your fancy.


    > I could write a piece of software and tell you that you're only allowed
    > to use it if you release _all_ future software you write under the GPL.
    > Even stuff which isn't at all related, let alone non-derived.

    Highly doubtful.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.018 / U:72.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site