lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:05:03PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 06:46 -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > Unless I need more coffee (which is certainly possible, it's early),
> > yeah, I disagree with this. A contract could do this but a copyright
> > based license doesn't seem like it can.
>
> Why so? I can license my work under whatever terms I please.
>
> I certainly can't force you to _accept_ the terms of my licence -- you
> always have the option to decline -- but in that case you may not use my
> work.

You may license *your* work under whatever terms you want. Those terms
can't extend to things that aren't your work in a copyright license.
You need a contract to do that and even then there are limits to what
you can do.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.160 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site