lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.0-test11-wli-1
Date
In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312091859330.2313@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
| On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
|
| > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:01:20PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
| > > Successfully tested on a Thinkpad T21. Any feedback regarding
| > > performance would be very helpful. Desktop users should notice top(1)
| > > is faster, kernel hackers that kernel compiles are faster, and highmem
| > > users should see much less per-process lowmem overhead.
| >
| > Bill Davidsen reported an issue where compiled kernel images aren't
| > properly distinguished from mainline kernels' by installation scripts.
| >
| > The following patch should resolve this:
|
| Argh, i've been screaming about this for ages...

Look, I'm a big boy now, I should be smart enough to *check* this,
because every once in a while other people (you know who you are) do it
too. My fault, I just noted it because other people may not be backed up
as well as I am and shoot their only working kernel.


--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans