lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: udev sysfs docs Re: State of devfs in 2.6?
Date
Witukind <witukind@nsbm.kicks-ass.org> writes:

> On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:39:32 +0100 mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård) wrote:
>
>> > Is there a specific case for which people want this feature?
>> > Offhand it seems like a slightly odd thing to ask for...
>>
>> I believe the original motivation for module autoloading was to save
>> memory by unloading modules when their devices were unused. Loading
>> them automatically on demand made for less trouble for users, who
>> didn't have to run modprobe manually to use the sound card, or
>> whatever. This could still be a good thing in embedded systems.
>>
>
> I don't see why it wouldn't be a good thing for regular systems
> also. Saving memory is usually a good idea.

The biggest modules are about 100k. Saving 100k of 1 GB doesn't
really seem worth any effort.

--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.150 / U:1.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site