Messages in this thread |  | | From | "David Schwartz" <> | Subject | RE: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause? | Date | Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:14:40 -0800 |
| |
> Notice? This is actually _exactly_ what I've been arguing all along, > except I've been arguing with a technical audience, so I've been using > technical examples and terminology. But my argument is that just the fact > that somebody compiled the code for Linux into a binary module that is > useless without a particular version of the kernel DOES MAKE IT A DERIVED > WORK.
So I'd need a license from Ford to make an aftermarket bumper. Their design is protected by copyright and my bumper is useless without a Ford car. You keep arguing for the type of world I don't want to live in. I really hope you're wrong.
DS
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |