[lkml]   [2003]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Device-mapper submission for 2.4
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Joe Thornber wrote:

> The LVM1 driver was removed because dm covered the same functionality
> + lots more, and is more flexible. The LVM2 tools still understand
> the LVM1 metadata format, so there is no problem about not being able
> to read data in 2.6.

So I was right. Well, if back compatibility works, this solves most of the

> The main reason for submitting dm to 2.4 was
> that there are a lot of people out there who want to use LVM2/EVMS
> tools with 2.4, and kept asking me to do it. If this is against
> Marcelos current policy then so be it; I probably should have checked
> with him before spamming lkml with the submission.

This is a good point, but patches are available, so those people can stil use
it, am I wrong?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.056 / U:22.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site