lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness
    Date
    On Saturday 08 November 2003 22:32, Denis wrote:
    > > > That nanosleep restart seems to be broken, and quite frankly,
    > > > looking at the mess in kernel/posix-timers.c I'm not all that
    > > > surprised. The code is total and absolute crap. I have no idea
    > > > how it's even supposed to work.
    > >
    > > I'd suggest just removing the regular nanosleep() emulation from
    > > there. The clock_nanosleep() restart is likely still broken, but at
    > > least this way the _regular_ nanosleep() system call works
    > > correctly, and fixing clock_nanosleep() is likely easier since the
    > > restart stuff doesn't have to worry about _which_ system call it
    > > should restart.
    > >
    > > Denis, does this work for you?
    >
    > Does not seem to work, same symptoms 8(

    Ok I retested with pristine test9+patch and it works.
    --
    vda
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.022 / U:0.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site