Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: CRAMFS | Date | 9 Nov 2003 07:15:03 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <35438.128.107.165.13.1068235628.squirrel@mail.yumbrad.com> By author: "Bradley Bozarth" <prettygood@cs.stanford.edu> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Daniel Quinlan originally maintained this, now it is orphaned. His endian > patch, which implemented the correct behavior according to the docs (which > basically listed always do little endian as a todo), was dropped. > > We have been maintaining this patch on our kernel, but it really should go > in - I don't want to spend a ton of time like I did last time to have it > dropped again, however - is anyone thinking of maintaining cramfs? What > are the chances of the endian fix going in if I submit it again? (if even > the former maintainer had no success). I would maintain cramfs if desired > - it hasn't really changed in a long time except in regards to higher > level fs changes. >
I think Al Viro has been doing a rewrite. You may want to check with him.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam. "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |