[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CRAMFS
Followup to:  <>
By author: "Bradley Bozarth" <>
In newsgroup:
> Daniel Quinlan originally maintained this, now it is orphaned. His endian
> patch, which implemented the correct behavior according to the docs (which
> basically listed always do little endian as a todo), was dropped.
> We have been maintaining this patch on our kernel, but it really should go
> in - I don't want to spend a ton of time like I did last time to have it
> dropped again, however - is anyone thinking of maintaining cramfs? What
> are the chances of the endian fix going in if I submit it again? (if even
> the former maintainer had no success). I would maintain cramfs if desired
> - it hasn't really changed in a long time except in regards to higher
> level fs changes.

I think Al Viro has been doing a rewrite. You may want to check with him.

<> at work, <> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans