Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 06 Nov 2003 18:26:34 -0500 | From | Chris Friesen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] SMP signal latency fix up. |
| |
Mark Gross wrote:
> diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c /opt/linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c > --- linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c 2003-10-25 11:44:29.000000000 -0700 > +++ /opt/linux-2.6.0-test9/kernel/sched.c 2003-11-06 13:04:03.628116240 -0800 > @@ -626,13 +626,13 @@ > } > success = 1; > } > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > - else > - if (unlikely(kick) && task_running(rq, p) && (task_cpu(p) != smp_processor_id())) > - smp_send_reschedule(task_cpu(p)); > -#endif > p->state = TASK_RUNNING; > } > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > + else > + if (unlikely(kick) && task_running(rq, p) && (task_cpu(p) != smp_processor_id())) > + smp_send_reschedule(task_cpu(p)); > +#endif > task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
Without any comment as to whether or not the patch would work, shouldn't the "else" be moved back by a tab?
Chris
-- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |