lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [DMESG] cpumask_t in action
From
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:42:31AM +0100, Antonio Vargas wrote:
> > As for the dentry and inode-cache tables, yes they're probably too big,
> > and they're also allocated on node 0 rather than being spread out.
> >
>
> Jesse, what about making hash_size = scale * log(mem_size), so that the
> tables are not scaled too high on your very-high-end boxes? ;)

Sounds good to me, should we change the callers in vfs_caches_init() or
revisit each individual hash to see what size makes sense?

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.157 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site