lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: get_cycles() on i386


Linus Torvalds wrote:

>On 4 Nov 2003, john stultz wrote:
>
>>CONFIG_X86_TSC be the devil. Personally, I'd much prefer dropping the
>>compile time option and using dynamic detection. Something like (not
>>recently tested and i believe against 2.5.something, but you get the
>>idea):
>>
>
>Some of the users are really timing-critical (eg scheduler).
>

The scheduler uses its own sched_clock which only gives jiffies
resolution if CONFIG_NUMA is defined. Unfortunate because I think
its interactive behaviour isn't so good with ms resolution.

The scheduler does not need to have synchronised TSCs though, I think.
It just means 2 more calls to sched_clock in a slow path (smp migration).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.169 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site