lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: BUG (non-kernel), can hurt developers.
    On Nov-26 2003, Wed, 10:29 -0800
    Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:

    > You can't just randomly use library functions in signal handlers. You can
    > only use a very specific "signal-safe" set.
    >
    > POSIX lists that set in 3.3.1.3 (3f), and says
    >
    > "All POSIX.1 functions not in the preceding table and all
    > functions defined in the C standard {2} not stated to be callable
    > from a signal-catching function are considered to be /unsafe/
    > with respect to signals. .."
    >
    > typos mine.
    >
    > The thing is, they have internal state that makes then non-reentrant (and
    > note that even the re-entrant ones might not be signal-safe, since they
    > may have deadlock issues: being thread-safe is _not_ the same as being
    > signal-safe).

    I believe it would be very useful to have this information included in
    the standard Linux signal(2) manpage. (I've just verified it's not in
    man-pages-1.60.)

    What do you think, Andries?

    --
    Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.021 / U:123.752 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site