[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.0-test10-mm1
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:29:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> But I do not think that making a single kernel symbol inaccessible is an
>> appropriate way of resolving a GPFS licensing dispute.
> well, GFPS is a derived work with or without it. It's just that I remember
> we had that agreement about merging it only with the _GPL export. In fact
> I'm pretty sure Paul told something about GPLed distributed filesystems from
> IBM in that context..

IBM has (at the very least) 2 clustered filesystems that use this. One is
GPL'ed, the other (GPFS) is not.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.032 / U:2.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site